A description of mental illness, the relationship between mental health and Christianity, the antinomy between self-denial and self-love, discussion of the meaning of life, and examination of what really brings about happiness.
‘You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you’ (John 15:16) Our wholeness comes from ‘him who calls’ (Romans 9:11).
Great blog post by Neal Abbott on the motives, purpose, meanings, intentions, and literary style and approach of Chekhov from his “A Word Fitly Spoken” blog (view the full article as initially posted on his blog here: https://nealabbott.wordpress.com/2014/08/25/writing-advice-from-anton-chekhov-part-three-ambiguity/comment-page-1/?unapproved=3349&moderation-hash=379fe5ae36cd0d349f5fb4e15d913fc4#comment-3349)
’It seems to me that the writer should not try to solve such questions as those of God, pessimism, etc. His business is but to describe those who have been speaking or thinking about God and pessimism, how and under what circumstances. The artist should be not the judge of his characters and their conversations, but only an unbiased observer […]
You are right in demanding that an artist should take an intelligent attitude to his work, but you confuse two things: solving a problem and stating a problem correctly. It is only the second that is obligatory for the artist […]
When I write, I reckon entirely upon the reader to add for himself the subjective elements that are lacking in the story’
(The Letters of Anton Chekhov)
Anton Chekhov is held up as the paragon of Minimalism. To me Minimalism is another way of describing good writing. In fact, I once heard Minimalism called Essentialism. Everything in the text is essential to the text.
To include the unnecessary is therefore bad writing. This is more than in details given in scenery or physical descriptions, it also has to do with subject matter and theme. No one ever called Chekhov an activist writer. Such he would abhor. One of the greatest contributions Chekhov ever made to the realm of Creative Writing was perfecting and demonstrating the craft of Ambiguity. None achieved it better with the possible exception of Shakespeare.
The Unbiased Observer
“It seems to me that the writer should not try to solve such questions as those of God, pessimism, etc. His business is but to describe those who have been speaking or thinking about God…
View original post 839 more words
I have long had a philosophical difficulty with the purpose of petitionary prayer. This is when a Christian prays to God, asking Him to bring something about. For example, a married couple may pray to God for a child, or one may pray for success or healing. Now traditional Christian belief holds that God is … Continue reading What’s the Point of Prayer?
A discussion of whether or not the claim that all religions lead to God is rationally, philosophically, theologically and Biblically credible.
(Guest blog written by Aaron Burrows) In this article, I shall attempt to discuss some of the tensions at play for modern Christians when attempting to imagine and understand the divine. It should be noted that I have, in this article, interpreted the divine to be the same as the God of Christianity. From the … Continue reading How should we think of God? (Guest Blog)
A rough, brief, step-by-step guide to the Church of England's Discernment Process for Young prospective Ordinands.
It just so happens that my great, great grandfather, Sir Arthur Somervell (1863-1937) was an English Romantic composer who was apparently, according to Wikipedia, 'after Hubert Parry one of the most successful and influential writers of art song in the English music renaissance of the 1890s-1900s'. This is an extraordinary coincidence, considering my strong interest in what I see … Continue reading Love Songs by my great, great grandfather, Sir Arthur Somervell
A very thorough, well-written and informative piece by Guestspeaker on the “Stepping Toes” blog. Well worth a read, particularly if you enjoyed my recent article entitled “Be strong and of good courage; be not afraid” which the author references in the following piece:
In this world there are lots of denominations in Christendom. Lots of Christians say that the non-trinitarian christians belong to cults or sects, but clearly than they forget what the characteristics of a sect or cult are.
The many non-Trinitarians who found one or another denomination in which they go to meetings are all free people with no obligations to that meeting, congregation or church except to live according to the commandments of God. In nearly all other Christian denominations of trinitarians we can find churches which dare to say they are the only church by which people can be saved or “go to heaven”. Nearly all of them are weekly asking money to their parishioners or even ask a tithing. Whilst in most of the non-trinitarian churches the parishioners are free to give or not to give any amount of money and are not…
View original post 3,490 more words
A discussion and evaluation of the Charismatic Movement and its impact.
An article encouraging those with misgivings and concerns about elements of their church's leadership, structure, worship, services, and preaching to be brave and speak out, and an explanation of the potential and possible eventual consequences of people not doing so.
A discussion of what the Biblical phrase "God-breathed" could mean and of how this could tie in with one's hermeneutics/exegesis/interpretation, and one's general view of Scripture and its authority.
In this article, I will discuss precisely what it means to be an "evangelical Christian" and explain whether or not I myself would choose to describe myself as one and why/why not.
In this article, I examine and discuss some of my favourite quotations about unrequited love.
Is the concept of "The One" in human love really true? If it is, how can we know who "The One" is? If it isn't true, then how can we make sense of God's sovereignty and predestination and the Christian commitment to monogamy in relation to this realisation? Has God prepared a partner for us in advance and, if so, how can we have any freedom in this area? If the concept of "The One" is not true, then how should we interpret the passages within Song of Songs which seem to suggest the truth of this concept?
An examination and discussion of questions including: What exactly does it mean to say that love is blind? Are both human love and divine love blind? If love is blind, is that a good thing?
I have listed below the books, poems and films which I personally have found most helpful in investigating the the definition, nature and philosophy of love.
In this article, I assess and examine love's powers of self-discovery, self-examination, and self-transformation, reform, and change.
I have listed below my favourite quotations about romantic love between humans. I personally am particularly interested in the nature, definition and philosophy of human love and so this may be reflected in my choice of quotations.
I have been thinking and reading about romantic human love a lot recently. In this article I will comment on quotations from my reading and try to derive and draw general, broad themes from my reading such as the immutability and eternality of love.